SARVAN SINGH AND ANR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/921/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 125,351(2),352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010074412026

Filing Number

C528/3540/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

C528/921/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 125,351(2),352
Arms Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) Section 25(9)/30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARVAN SINGH AND ANR

    Adv. S R S GILL,MILIND RAJ,MILIND RAJ, ,MILIND RAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.HEERA SINGH

    Adv. KUNDAN SINGH,NAVEEN SINGH MER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    The High Court quashed the criminal charge-sheet and proceedings against Sarvan Singh and another for alleged abusive behavior, threats, and firing a licensed firearm on February 15, 2025. Finding the dispute personal in nature with no actual injuries, no person sustained injuries, and parties having voluntarily settled their dispute, the court exercised its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings, holding continuance would amount to abuse of process. However, the court reserved its opinion on administrative proceedings regarding the firearm licence, leaving that to the District Magistrate's independent decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/921/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court quashed the criminal charge-sheet and proceedings against Sarvan Singh and another for alleged abusive behavior, threats, and firing a licensed firearm on February 15, 2025. Finding the dispute personal in nature with no actual injuries, no person sustained injuries, and parties having voluntarily settled their dispute, the court exercised its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings, holding continuance would amount to abuse of process. However, the court reserved its opinion on administrative proceedings regarding the firearm licence, leaving that to the District Magistrate's independent decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case