MOHD. NASEEM vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/920/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,498-A,504,506. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010074322026
Filing Number
C528/3536/2026
Filing Date
05-05-2026
Registration No
C528/920/2026
Registration Date
05-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHD. NASEEM
Adv. GEETANJALI DHAMI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
RANI BI
Adv. TANUJA JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the petition and quashed Criminal Case No. 472 of 2025 against petitioner Mohd. Naseem, arising from matrimonial discord with his wife. Although the case involved non-compoundable offence under Section 498-A IPC, the court exercised inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., finding the parties had genuinely reconciled, were living together peacefully, and the complainant/wife no longer wished to prosecute, making continued proceedings futile and harmful to matrimonial harmony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the petition and quashed Criminal Case No. 472 of 2025 against petitioner Mohd. Naseem, arising from matrimonial discord with his wife. Although the case involved non-compoundable offence under Section 498-A IPC, the court exercised inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., finding the parties had genuinely reconciled, were living together peacefully, and the complainant/wife no longer wished to prosecute, making continued proceedings futile and harmful to matrimonial harmony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts