PARAS SINGH AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/917/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,498-A,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010074292026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

C528/3533/2026

Filing Date

05-05-2026

Registration No

C528/917/2026

Registration Date

05-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,498-A,504,506

Petitioner(s)

PARAS SINGH AND ORS

Adv. TARUN PRAKASH SINGH TAKULI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

MS. REENA DEOPA

Adv. SHIVAM SINGH PARGAI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

07-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

07-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

The Uttarakhand High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Paras Singh and his in-laws under IPC Sections 323, 498-A, 504, and 506, arising from matrimonial discord. The parties amicably settled their dispute with a ₹4,50,000 compensation agreement and filed for mutual divorce, with the complainant explicitly consenting to quashing the proceedings. The court held that criminal cases of predominantly civil character arising from matrimonial disputes, lacking serious public interest or heinous elements, should be quashed when parties achieve settlement to secure justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Paras Singh and his in-laws under IPC Sections 323, 498-A, 504, and 506, arising from matrimonial discord. The parties amicably settled their dispute with a ₹4,50,000 compensation agreement and filed for mutual divorce, with the complainant explicitly consenting to quashing the proceedings. The court held that criminal cases of predominantly civil character arising from matrimonial disputes, lacking serious public interest or heinous elements, should be quashed when parties achieve settlement to secure justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case