PARAS SINGH AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/917/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,498-A,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010074292026

Filing Number

C528/3533/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

C528/917/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,498-A,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARAS SINGH AND ORS

    Adv. TARUN PRAKASH SINGH TAKULI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.MS. REENA DEOPA

    Adv. SHIVAM SINGH PARGAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    The Uttarakhand High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Paras Singh and his in-laws under IPC Sections 323, 498-A, 504, and 506, arising from matrimonial discord. The parties amicably settled their dispute with a ₹4,50,000 compensation agreement and filed for mutual divorce, with the complainant explicitly consenting to quashing the proceedings. The court held that criminal cases of predominantly civil character arising from matrimonial disputes, lacking serious public interest or heinous elements, should be quashed when parties achieve settlement to secure justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/917/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Paras Singh and his in-laws under IPC Sections 323, 498-A, 504, and 506, arising from matrimonial discord. The parties amicably settled their dispute with a ₹4,50,000 compensation agreement and filed for mutual divorce, with the complainant explicitly consenting to quashing the proceedings. The court held that criminal cases of predominantly civil character arising from matrimonial disputes, lacking serious public interest or heinous elements, should be quashed when parties achieve settlement to secure justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case