SAGAR BADOLA AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/909/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 406,420,467,468,120B. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010074022026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

C528/3515/2026

Filing Date

04-05-2026

Registration No

C528/909/2026

Registration Date

04-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 406,420,467,468,120B

Petitioner(s)

SAGAR BADOLA AND ORS

Adv. RAVI JOSHI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

JASPAL SINGH MAAN

Adv. GAURAV KANDPAL

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

06-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

06-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

The Uttarakhand High Court quashed criminal proceedings against three Muthoot Finance employees accused of embezzlement, forgery, and criminal conspiracy after the parties amicably settled their dispute and the full disputed amount was paid. Although some offences were non-compoundable, the court exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, finding the dispute predominantly civil in nature and that continuing proceedings would abuse judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court quashed criminal proceedings against three Muthoot Finance employees accused of embezzlement, forgery, and criminal conspiracy after the parties amicably settled their dispute and the full disputed amount was paid. Although some offences were non-compoundable, the court exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, finding the dispute predominantly civil in nature and that continuing proceedings would abuse judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case