SAGAR BADOLA AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/909/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 406,420,467,468,120B. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010074022026

Filing Number

C528/3515/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

C528/909/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 406,420,467,468,120B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAGAR BADOLA AND ORS

    Adv. RAVI JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.JASPAL SINGH MAAN

    Adv. GAURAV KANDPAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    The Uttarakhand High Court quashed criminal proceedings against three Muthoot Finance employees accused of embezzlement, forgery, and criminal conspiracy after the parties amicably settled their dispute and the full disputed amount was paid. Although some offences were non-compoundable, the court exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, finding the dispute predominantly civil in nature and that continuing proceedings would abuse judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/909/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court quashed criminal proceedings against three Muthoot Finance employees accused of embezzlement, forgery, and criminal conspiracy after the parties amicably settled their dispute and the full disputed amount was paid. Although some offences were non-compoundable, the court exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC, finding the dispute predominantly civil in nature and that continuing proceedings would abuse judicial process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case