RAJIV KUMAR AGGARWAL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/813/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010073972026

Filing Number

WPCRL/3511/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/813/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJIV KUMAR AGGARWAL

    Adv. AMANJOT SINGH CHADHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.AMIT KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    The High Court disposed of Rajiv Kumar Aggarwal's petition challenging FIR No. 0152/2026 under IPC Section 420 (Cheating) by directing the Investigating Officer to comply with Arnesh Kumar guidelines for offences punishable up to seven years, including issuing appropriate notices during investigation. The court accepted both petitioner's and State's submissions that mandatory procedural safeguards apply to this offense category. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  4. 06-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/813/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court disposed of Rajiv Kumar Aggarwal's petition challenging FIR No. 0152/2026 under IPC Section 420 (Cheating) by directing the Investigating Officer to comply with Arnesh Kumar guidelines for offences punishable up to seven years, including issuing appropriate notices during investigation. The court accepted both petitioner's and State's submissions that mandatory procedural safeguards apply to this offense category. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case