MOHD. ASHRAF AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/907/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010073942026

Filing Number

C528/3510/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

C528/907/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. ASHRAF AND ORS

    Adv. NEERAJ PARIHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.MOHD. RAFI

    Adv. AMANJOT SINGH CHADHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    The court allowed the compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No.3037 of 2017 based on the compromise reached between petitioners Mohd. Ashraf and respondent Mohd. Rafi. Following Supreme Court precedent that criminal proceedings should be quashed when conviction is unlikely due to settlement between parties, the court permitted the offences to be compounded and set aside the charge sheet and cognizance order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/907/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No.3037 of 2017 based on the compromise reached between petitioners Mohd. Ashraf and respondent Mohd. Rafi. Following Supreme Court precedent that criminal proceedings should be quashed when conviction is unlikely due to settlement between parties, the court permitted the offences to be compounded and set aside the charge sheet and cognizance order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case