AMIT KUMAR AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/905/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 498-A,323,419,504. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010073872026
Filing Number
C528/3507/2026
Filing Date
04-05-2026
Registration No
C528/905/2026
Registration Date
04-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMIT KUMAR AND ORS
Adv. SHARIQ KHURSHID
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
ANITA BHARTI
Adv. PRINCE CHAUHAN
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
The court allowed the compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No.1313 of 2023 after the parties reached an amicable settlement involving ₹20 lakh permanent alimony (₹10 lakh already paid, balance before second motion). The court found that continuation of proceedings would cause prejudice to the accused where conviction was remote, and respondent no.2 no longer wished to pursue the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No.1313 of 2023 after the parties reached an amicable settlement involving ₹20 lakh permanent alimony (₹10 lakh already paid, balance before second motion). The court found that continuation of proceedings would cause prejudice to the accused where conviction was remote, and respondent no.2 no longer wished to pursue the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts