SANJEEV KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/1254/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010073802026

Filing Number

WPMS/3875/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1254/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJEEV KUMAR

    Adv. RAVI BISHT

  2. 2.KULDEEP CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.ASSISTANT COLLECTOR FIRST CLASS

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.TEHSILDAR ROORKEE

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    The writ petition filed by Sanjeev Kumar and Kuldeep Chauhan against the State of Uttarakhand was dismissed on 06.05.2026. The petitioners' counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition during oral arguments, which the court granted with liberty to file a fresh petition in the future if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1254/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The writ petition filed by Sanjeev Kumar and Kuldeep Chauhan against the State of Uttarakhand was dismissed on 06.05.2026. The petitioners' counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition during oral arguments, which the court granted with liberty to file a fresh petition in the future if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case