SAURABH SINGH NEGI vs MISSION DIRECTOR NATIONAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE MISSION — WPSS/1206/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010073762026

Filing Number

WPSS/3872/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1206/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

MISC ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAURABH SINGH NEGI

    Adv. SURESH CHANDRA BHATT,GAURAV BHATT,GAURAV BHATT, ,GAURAV BHATT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MISSION DIRECTOR NATIONAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE MISSION

  2. 2.CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The court dismissed the writ petition but allowed the petitioner to file a representation with the Mission Director within three weeks, with a decision to be rendered within four months thereafter. The court found that while increments are typically available only to regular employees, the petitioner's claim warranted administrative review rather than judicial mandamus at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1206/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the writ petition but allowed the petitioner to file a representation with the Mission Director within three weeks, with a decision to be rendered within four months thereafter. The court found that while increments are typically available only to regular employees, the petitioner's claim warranted administrative review rather than judicial mandamus at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case