VIKAS SINGH ALIAS VIKAS KUMAR YADAV vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/898/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),191(2),351(2),352,74. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010073192026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
C528/3481/2026
Filing Date
02-05-2026
Registration No
C528/898/2026
Registration Date
02-05-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIKAS SINGH ALIAS VIKAS KUMAR YADAV
Adv. SANJAY KUMAR CHANDEL
JAGAT SINGH
RAMPAL SINGH YADAV
DEEPAK YADAV
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
SURESH CHANDRA
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
Orders
Case C528/898/2026 Summary: The court issued notice to respondent no. 2 and stayed further proceedings in the underlying special sessions trial (S.S.T. No. 193 of 2026) pending before the POCSO court in Rudrapur. The applicants challenged an FIR involving sexual harassment allegations, arguing the charges stem from a neighbor dispute over sewage overflow and were filed as afterthought retaliation. Though rape allegations were unsubstantiated, charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 191(2), 351(2), and 352 proceeded. The matter was listed for further hearing after service of notice on the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case C528/898/2026 Summary: The court issued notice to respondent no. 2 and stayed further proceedings in the underlying special sessions trial (S.S.T. No. 193 of 2026) pending before the POCSO court in Rudrapur. The applicants challenged an FIR involving sexual harassment allegations, arguing the charges stem from a neighbor dispute over sewage overflow and were filed as afterthought retaliation. Though rape allegations were unsubstantiated, charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 191(2), 351(2), and 352 proceeded. The matter was listed for further hearing after service of notice on the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts