BALWAN AND OTHERS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/899/2026

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Act No. 43 of 2005) Section 12,17,18,19,20,21,22. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010072582026

Filing Number

C528/3457/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

C528/899/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Act No. 43 of 2005) Section 12,17,18,19,20,21,22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALWAN AND OTHERS

    Adv. SHALINI THAKRAL,VISHAL KUMAR NAUTIYAL,VISHAL KUMAR NAUTIYAL, ,AKSHAY PRADHAN,VISHAL KUMAR NAUTIYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.MEENA DEVI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: C528/899/2026 Outcome: Petition partially allowed. The court stayed proceedings against applicants 4-6 (maternal aunt, uncle, and cousin brother-in-law of respondent), finding they reside separately with no direct involvement in the matrimonial dispute. However, proceedings against applicants 1-3 (husband, father-in-law, and mother-in-law) continue. Notice issued to respondent (Meena Devi), with matter listed after service report receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/899/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/899/2026 Outcome: Petition partially allowed. The court stayed proceedings against applicants 4-6 (maternal aunt, uncle, and cousin brother-in-law of respondent), finding they reside separately with no direct involvement in the matrimonial dispute. However, proceedings against applicants 1-3 (husband, father-in-law, and mother-in-law) continue. Notice issued to respondent (Meena Devi), with matter listed after service report receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case