ALIM vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/800/2026

Case under Up Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986 Section 2,3. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 05th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010072472026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPCRL/3450/2026

Filing Date

02-05-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/800/2026

Registration Date

02-05-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Acts & Sections

Up Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986 Section 2,3

Petitioner(s)

ALIM

Adv. BILAL AHMED

MOHD KHURSHEED

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

S.H.O, PS (Police Station) KOTWALI BHAGWANPUR,

Adv. G.A.

SHO (Station House Officer) RITESH SAH

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

05-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

05-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Alim and Mohd Khursheed seeking quashing of FIR Case Crime No. 0164 of 2026 under the U.P. Gangster Act & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with the petitioners given liberty to surrender before the concerned court by 03.06.2026, during which period no coercive action shall be taken against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Alim and Mohd Khursheed seeking quashing of FIR Case Crime No. 0164 of 2026 under the U.P. Gangster Act & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with the petitioners given liberty to surrender before the concerned court by 03.06.2026, during which period no coercive action shall be taken against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case