BEENA DHAMI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/892/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 420,494,495. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010072312026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

C528/3445/2026

Filing Date

30-04-2026

Registration No

C528/892/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 420,494,495

Petitioner(s)

BEENA DHAMI

Adv. YOGESH PANT,HARSHI GUPTA,HARSHI GUPTA, ,HARSHI GUPTA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

DHRUV SHARMA

Adv. M C PANT

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

04-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

04-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Case Summary: C528/892/2026 - Beena Dhami v. State of Uttarakhand & Dhruv Sharma The court allowed the petition to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 2920 of 2020) against Beena Dhami for offenses under IPC Sections 420, 494, and 495 (fraud, bigamy). The parties executed a settlement agreement on 27.04.2026, wherein both agreed to withdraw all pending litigations. Finding no useful purpose in continuing criminal proceedings arising from matrimonial discord, Justice Alok Mahra quashed the summoning order dated 25.11.2021 and all related proceedings before the 5th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/892/2026 - Beena Dhami v. State of Uttarakhand & Dhruv Sharma The court allowed the petition to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 2920 of 2020) against Beena Dhami for offenses under IPC Sections 420, 494, and 495 (fraud, bigamy). The parties executed a settlement agreement on 27.04.2026, wherein both agreed to withdraw all pending litigations. Finding no useful purpose in continuing criminal proceedings arising from matrimonial discord, Justice Alok Mahra quashed the summoning order dated 25.11.2021 and all related proceedings before the 5th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case