ASHA MATIYALI ALIAS ASHA DEVI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/1214/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010071892026

Filing Number

WPMS/3763/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1214/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF MISC MATTER ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHA MATIYALI ALIAS ASHA DEVI

    Adv. LALIT SHARMA,ANANYA THAPLIYAL,ANANYA THAPLIYAL, ,SURAIYA NAAZ,ANANYA THAPLIYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.RETURNING OFFICER

    Adv. SANJAY BHATT

  3. 3.NIRMAL SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    The court disposed of the petition with directions to the District Judge, Nainital to hear the petitioner's stay application in the revision, or if parties are ready, to decide the case on merits expeditiously, provided proper service of respondent no.1 has been completed. The prayer was considered innocuous and unopposed by respondent no.2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1214/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the petition with directions to the District Judge, Nainital to hear the petitioner's stay application in the revision, or if parties are ready, to decide the case on merits expeditiously, provided proper service of respondent no.1 has been completed. The prayer was considered innocuous and unopposed by respondent no.2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case