GAUTAM SINGH DANU vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/722/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 29th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010071822026
Filing Number
BA1/3424/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
BA1/722/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
29-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAUTAM SINGH DANU
Adv. AMIT KAPRI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
Case Summary: BA1/722/2026 - Gautam Singh Danu v. State of Uttarakhand The Uttarakhand High Court rejected the bail application of 18-year-old Gautam Singh Danu, accused under Sections 8/20 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 2 kg of charas (hashish) recovered during a routine police check on 25.03.2026. The applicant contended false implication and procedural violations under the NDPS Act; however, Justice Ashish Naithani found the case unsuitable for bail, citing the commercial quantity of contraband recovered, and dismissed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-May-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA1/722/2026
Case Summary: BA1/722/2026 - Gautam Singh Danu v. State of Uttarakhand The Uttarakhand High Court rejected the bail application of 18-year-old Gautam Singh Danu, accused under Sections 8/20 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 2 kg of charas (hashish) recovered during a routine police check on 25.03.2026. The applicant contended false implication and procedural violations under the NDPS Act; however, Justice Ashish Naithani found the case unsuitable for bail, citing the commercial quantity of contraband recovered, and dismissed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts