GAUTAM SINGH DANU vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/722/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 29th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010071822026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1/3424/2026

Filing Date

30-04-2026

Registration No

BA1/722/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

29th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20

Petitioner(s)

GAUTAM SINGH DANU

Adv. AMIT KAPRI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

04-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

28-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

29-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Case Summary: BA1/722/2026 - Gautam Singh Danu v. State of Uttarakhand The Uttarakhand High Court rejected the bail application of 18-year-old Gautam Singh Danu, accused under Sections 8/20 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 2 kg of charas (hashish) recovered during a routine police check on 25.03.2026. The applicant contended false implication and procedural violations under the NDPS Act; however, Justice Ashish Naithani found the case unsuitable for bail, citing the commercial quantity of contraband recovered, and dismissed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA1/722/2026 - Gautam Singh Danu v. State of Uttarakhand The Uttarakhand High Court rejected the bail application of 18-year-old Gautam Singh Danu, accused under Sections 8/20 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 2 kg of charas (hashish) recovered during a routine police check on 25.03.2026. The applicant contended false implication and procedural violations under the NDPS Act; however, Justice Ashish Naithani found the case unsuitable for bail, citing the commercial quantity of contraband recovered, and dismissed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case