RIZWANA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/792/2026

Case under Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 (Act No. 06 of 2007) Section 3,5,11. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010071732026

Filing Number

WPCRL/3418/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/792/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 (Act No. 06 of 2007) Section 3,5,11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RIZWANA

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

  2. 2.MAJAHIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.SUB INSPECTOR SHARAD SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition as to petitioner Majahir, who agreed to surrender before the competent court. For petitioner Rizwana, the court declined to quash the FIR registered under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, but granted interim protection by restraining coercive action against her during investigation, provided she cooperates with police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/792/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition as to petitioner Majahir, who agreed to surrender before the competent court. For petitioner Rizwana, the court declined to quash the FIR registered under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, but granted interim protection by restraining coercive action against her during investigation, provided she cooperates with police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case