LAXMAN SINGH NEGI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/791/2026

Case under Arms Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) Section 30. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010071702026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPCRL/3416/2026

Filing Date

30-04-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/791/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Arms Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) Section 30
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 125(A)

Petitioner(s)

LAXMAN SINGH NEGI

Adv. SAURABH KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Adv. G.A.

KAMAL KUMAR YADAV

Adv. NALIN SAUN

NILIMA YADAV

Adv. NALIN SAUN

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

04-05-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

Orders

06-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

The court allowed Laxman Singh Negi's writ petition and compounding application, quashing FIR Case Crime No. 86 of 2026 dated 24.02.2026. The incident occurred during a Mehandi ceremony where the petitioner was an invited guest; the complainant and victim subsequently settled their disputes and confirmed they had cordial relations and no enmity, requesting the case be dropped. Since the offense under Section 125(a) of BNS 2023 was compoundable and parties sought withdrawal, the court found no useful purpose in continuing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Laxman Singh Negi's writ petition and compounding application, quashing FIR Case Crime No. 86 of 2026 dated 24.02.2026. The incident occurred during a Mehandi ceremony where the petitioner was an invited guest; the complainant and victim subsequently settled their disputes and confirmed they had cordial relations and no enmity, requesting the case be dropped. Since the offense under Section 125(a) of BNS 2023 was compoundable and parties sought withdrawal, the court found no useful purpose in continuing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case