CHANDRA SHEKHAR BHUTANI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/790/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420,465,467,468,471. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010071632026
Filing Number
WPCRL/3414/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPCRL/790/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
FIR QUASHING ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANDRA SHEKHAR BHUTANI
Adv. RAMJI SHRIVASTAVA,STUTI PANDEY,STUTI PANDEY, ,STUTI PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Adv. G.A.
-
3.SRI PREM KUMAR BHUTANI ALIAS PREM PRAKASH BHUTANI
Adv. GAURAV NAGPAL, AMIT TYAGI (FOR CAVEATOR)
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Jun-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
Case Summary: WPCRL 790/2024 Chandra Shekhar Bhutani challenged an FIR alleging forgery of signatures related to MDDA map sanction. The court adjourned the matter to 30.06.2026, directing respondents to file counter-affidavits within four weeks and petitioner to file rejoinder thereafter. Investigation may proceed without coercive measures against the petitioner, provided he cooperates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPCRL/790/2026
Case Summary: WPCRL 790/2024 Chandra Shekhar Bhutani challenged an FIR alleging forgery of signatures related to MDDA map sanction. The court adjourned the matter to 30.06.2026, directing respondents to file counter-affidavits within four weeks and petitioner to file rejoinder thereafter. Investigation may proceed without coercive measures against the petitioner, provided he cooperates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts