ARJUN SINGH vs DR SURENDRA NARAYAN PANDEY — CLCON/222/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010071622026
Filing Number
CLCON/3748/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
CLCON/222/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 6 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARJUN SINGH
Adv. HARENDRA BELWAL
-
2.MANOJ RANA
-
3.PRADEEP
-
4.RAVI KASHYAP
-
5.MANOJ KUMAR
-
6.KARTIK
-
7.GAYTRI DEVI
-
8.PHOOL JAIN KUMAR
-
9.JANG BAHADUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.DR SURENDRA NARAYAN PANDEY
-
2.DR DEEPA VINAY
-
3.DR G C JOSHI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
Case Summary: CLCON/222/2026 On 08.05.2026, the court found that respondents (Dr. Surendra Narayan Pandey, Dr. Deepa Vinay, and Dr. G.C. Joshi) failed to comply with a January 6, 2025 writ court judgment despite an extended four-month compliance period that had expired. The court determined contempt was made out and issued notices to the respondents to file responses why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The case was adjourned to 29.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CLCON/222/2026
Case Summary: CLCON/222/2026 On 08.05.2026, the court found that respondents (Dr. Surendra Narayan Pandey, Dr. Deepa Vinay, and Dr. G.C. Joshi) failed to comply with a January 6, 2025 writ court judgment despite an extended four-month compliance period that had expired. The court determined contempt was made out and issued notices to the respondents to file responses why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The case was adjourned to 29.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts