GIRDHARI vs DR SURENDRA NARAYAN PANDEY — CLCON/220/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010071582026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CLCON/3746/2026
Filing Date
30-04-2026
Registration No
CLCON/220/2026
Registration Date
30-04-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 6 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GIRDHARI
Adv. HARENDRA BELWAL
ARVIND KUMAR
SURESH KUMAR
LALIT MOHAN PATHAK
MANOJ PANT
SAVANTI
VIFIYA
MAKHANI
LALAJI
KAVITA
Respondent(s)
DR SURENDRA NARAYAN PANDEY
DR DEEPA VINAY
DR G C JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 29-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 08-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Summary: In this contempt of court case (CLCON 220/2026), Justice Rakesh Thapliyal found that respondents Dr. Surendra Narayan Pandey, Dr. Deepa Vinay, and Dr. G.C. Joshi (G.B. Pant University officials) failed to comply with a January 6, 2025 writ court judgment even after being granted a four-month extension. The court issued notices to the respondents requiring them to file responses explaining why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, with the matter listed for hearing on May 29, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this contempt of court case (CLCON 220/2026), Justice Rakesh Thapliyal found that respondents Dr. Surendra Narayan Pandey, Dr. Deepa Vinay, and Dr. G.C. Joshi (G.B. Pant University officials) failed to comply with a January 6, 2025 writ court judgment even after being granted a four-month extension. The court issued notices to the respondents requiring them to file responses explaining why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, with the matter listed for hearing on May 29, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts