ASHOK KUMAR vs SURENDRA NARAYAN PANDEY — CLCON/219/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010071572026
Filing Number
CLCON/3745/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
CLCON/219/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 6 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOK KUMAR
Adv. HARENDRA BELWAL
-
2.RAM BETI
-
3.SURESH SAH
-
4.SATENDRA KUMAR
-
5.BHEEM SINGH
-
6.MADHURI
-
7.RAKESH KUMAR
-
8.TEJ RAM
-
9.ANIL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURENDRA NARAYAN PANDEY
-
2.DR DEEPA VINAY
-
3.DR G C JOSHI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
Summary of CLCON/219/2026 The court found that respondents (G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology officials) failed to comply with a January 6, 2025 writ court judgment within the extended four-month deadline. The contempt court rejected the University's excuse that proposals were sent to the Government, holding that contempt proceedings assess only whether judgments are complied with in letter and spirit. Notices were issued to respondents to show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, with the case listed for May 29, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CLCON/219/2026
Summary of CLCON/219/2026 The court found that respondents (G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology officials) failed to comply with a January 6, 2025 writ court judgment within the extended four-month deadline. The contempt court rejected the University's excuse that proposals were sent to the Government, holding that contempt proceedings assess only whether judgments are complied with in letter and spirit. Notices were issued to respondents to show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, with the case listed for May 29, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts