RAJ KUMAR vs UTTARAKHAND STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION LIMITED Advocate - INDU SHARMA — WPSS/1172/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010071392026

Filing Number

WPSS/3731/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPSS/1172/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PAY AND ALLOWANCES ( 17 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR

    Adv. PRAMOD KUMAR,TIJIL GANGWAR,TIJIL GANGWAR, ,TIJIL GANGWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UTTARAKHAND STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION LIMITED Advocate - INDU SHARMA

  2. 2.ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER

    Adv. INDU SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The court disposed of the writ petition filed by Raj Kumar, a driver with Uttarakhand State Road Transport Corporation, who claimed his pay was wrongly fixed at a lower level despite exoneration from 19 disciplinary enquiries. Hon'ble Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari directed the Managing Director to decide on the petitioner's representation dated 1.4.2026 within eight weeks in accordance with law, accepting the respondent's assurance to resolve the pay fixation discrepancy before the petitioner's retirement in two years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/1172/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the writ petition filed by Raj Kumar, a driver with Uttarakhand State Road Transport Corporation, who claimed his pay was wrongly fixed at a lower level despite exoneration from 19 disciplinary enquiries. Hon'ble Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari directed the Managing Director to decide on the petitioner's representation dated 1.4.2026 within eight weeks in accordance with law, accepting the respondent's assurance to resolve the pay fixation discrepancy before the petitioner's retirement in two years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case