MS VIRAL BUILDON PVT LTD vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STATE TAX SECTOR 2 Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMB/332/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010071322026
Filing Number
WPMB/3725/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPMB/332/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT ( 48 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MS VIRAL BUILDON PVT LTD
Adv. AZMEEN WASON
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STATE TAX SECTOR 2 Advocate - C.S.C.
-
2.COMMISSIONER STATE TAX
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
Case Summary: WPMB/332/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand quashed the Assistant Commissioner's refund rejection order dated 24.02.2026 for violating Rule 93(3) of CGST Rules. The petitioner requested a virtual hearing in their reply to the Show Cause Notice, but the department passed the rejection order without considering this request or scheduling any hearing date, thereby denying natural justice. The court remitted the matter back for reconsideration in accordance with law, allowing the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases As Defective -236
Registrar (Judicial)
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMB/332/2026
Case Summary: WPMB/332/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand quashed the Assistant Commissioner's refund rejection order dated 24.02.2026 for violating Rule 93(3) of CGST Rules. The petitioner requested a virtual hearing in their reply to the Show Cause Notice, but the department passed the rejection order without considering this request or scheduling any hearing date, thereby denying natural justice. The court remitted the matter back for reconsideration in accordance with law, allowing the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts