RESHAB SARKAR AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/878/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),318(4),351(2),352. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010071172026
Filing Number
C528/3403/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
C528/878/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RESHAB SARKAR AND ORS
Adv. ABHISHEK SINGH RAWAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.HIMANSHU KUMAR
Adv. BABITA JALAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
Case Summary: C528/878/2026 The court quashed the charge-sheet and cognizance order in a land dispute case involving Reshab Sarkar and others versus the State of Uttarakhand. The applicants were accused of failing to execute a sale deed despite receiving payment from the complainant. However, the parties reached a voluntary settlement through mediation, with applicants paying ₹23,00,000 in full settlement, and the complainant agreed to withdraw proceedings. Justice Alok Mahra held that since the dispute was predominantly civil in nature arising from a contractual transaction and the parties had settled amicably, continuing criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose and constitute abuse of court process. The application was accordingly allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Fresh Cases As Defective -236
Registrar (Judicial)
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. C528/878/2026
Case Summary: C528/878/2026 The court quashed the charge-sheet and cognizance order in a land dispute case involving Reshab Sarkar and others versus the State of Uttarakhand. The applicants were accused of failing to execute a sale deed despite receiving payment from the complainant. However, the parties reached a voluntary settlement through mediation, with applicants paying ₹23,00,000 in full settlement, and the complainant agreed to withdraw proceedings. Justice Alok Mahra held that since the dispute was predominantly civil in nature arising from a contractual transaction and the parties had settled amicably, continuing criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose and constitute abuse of court process. The application was accordingly allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts