ADESH SAINI ALIAS FAUJI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/788/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/22. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
CNR: UKHC010071092026
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
Filing Number
WPCRL/3399/2026
Filing Date
29-04-2026
Registration No
WPCRL/788/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
FIR QUASHING ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ADESH SAINI ALIAS FAUJI
Adv. RAJNI RANGWAL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Adv. G.A.
UPPER S.I. HEMRAJ SINGH PAWAR
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 03-07-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 08-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPCRL 788/2026 Petitioner Adesh Saini sought quashing of an NDPS Act FIR lodged against co-accused Sumit Sharma. The court found no material evidence against the petitioner during investigation, though his name was disclosed by other accused. The petition was adjourned to 30.07.2026 with respondents directed to file counter-affidavits within four weeks. Crucially, the court granted interim protection prohibiting arrest or coercive action against the petitioner, provided he cooperates with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPCRL 788/2026 Petitioner Adesh Saini sought quashing of an NDPS Act FIR lodged against co-accused Sumit Sharma. The court found no material evidence against the petitioner during investigation, though his name was disclosed by other accused. The petition was adjourned to 30.07.2026 with respondents directed to file counter-affidavits within four weeks. Crucially, the court granted interim protection prohibiting arrest or coercive action against the petitioner, provided he cooperates with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts