VISHAL DHIMAN vs RAVI VERMA — C528/875/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010070862026
Filing Number
C528/3386/2026
Filing Date
29-04-2026
Registration No
C528/875/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 138 N.I. ACT ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VISHAL DHIMAN
Adv. ANUJ KUMAR TYAGI
Respondent(s)
RAVI VERMA
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
Orders
Case Summary: C528/875/2026 — VISHAL DHIMAN v. RAVI VERMA The court dismissed Vishal Dhiman's application challenging the summoning order in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. Dhiman argued the complaint was unmaintainable because the demand notice under Section 138(b) was issued over one month after the cheque dishonor on 20.04.2020. The court rejected this argument, holding that the Supreme Court's January 2022 judgment excluded the COVID-19 lockdown period (15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022) from limitation calculations, making the delayed notice valid. The summoning order dated 08.01.2021 was upheld as legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C528/875/2026 — VISHAL DHIMAN v. RAVI VERMA The court dismissed Vishal Dhiman's application challenging the summoning order in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. Dhiman argued the complaint was unmaintainable because the demand notice under Section 138(b) was issued over one month after the cheque dishonor on 20.04.2020. The court rejected this argument, holding that the Supreme Court's January 2022 judgment excluded the COVID-19 lockdown period (15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022) from limitation calculations, making the delayed notice valid. The summoning order dated 08.01.2021 was upheld as legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts