PARVINDER KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/867/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010070282026

Filing Number

C528/3350/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

C528/867/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARVINDER KUMAR

    Adv. GAURAV SINGH

  2. 2.NAZAKAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.VIJAYPAL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: C528/867/2026 Petitioners Parvinder Kumar and Nazakat sought to quash criminal proceedings arising from a car sale dispute with respondent Vijaypal. The parties had executed a notarized sale agreement for ₹7,00,000 but disputed the vehicle's return after the petitioners allegedly took it back temporarily. The petitioners contended the matter was purely civil and amicably settled, with no fraudulent intent at inception. Order: The court issued notice to respondent no.2 (returnable within six weeks) and imposed an interim stay on further proceedings in Complaint Case No.3156 of 2014 pending before the Roorkee Magistrate until the next hearing. The matter was listed for further consideration after service of notice upon the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/867/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/867/2026 Petitioners Parvinder Kumar and Nazakat sought to quash criminal proceedings arising from a car sale dispute with respondent Vijaypal. The parties had executed a notarized sale agreement for ₹7,00,000 but disputed the vehicle's return after the petitioners allegedly took it back temporarily. The petitioners contended the matter was purely civil and amicably settled, with no fraudulent intent at inception. Order: The court issued notice to respondent no.2 (returnable within six weeks) and imposed an interim stay on further proceedings in Complaint Case No.3156 of 2014 pending before the Roorkee Magistrate until the next hearing. The matter was listed for further consideration after service of notice upon the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case