SANAWWAR AND ANR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/771/2026

Case under Up Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986 Section 2/3. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010070082026

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

WPCRL/3340/2026

Filing Date

28-04-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/771/2026

Registration Date

28-04-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Up Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986 Section 2/3

Petitioner(s)

SANAWWAR AND ANR

Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Adv. G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

30-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

08-06-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

04-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

04-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Case Summary: WPCRL 771/2026 Brothers Sanawwar and Tasawwar sought quashing of FIR No. 73/2026 registered under the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986. The court adjourned the matter to 08.06.2026, directing the state to file objections within three weeks and petitioners to file rejoinder thereafter. Pending final hearing, investigation was permitted to continue but no coercive action against petitioners, conditioned on their monthly reporting to the concerned police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPCRL 771/2026 Brothers Sanawwar and Tasawwar sought quashing of FIR No. 73/2026 registered under the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986. The court adjourned the matter to 08.06.2026, directing the state to file objections within three weeks and petitioners to file rejoinder thereafter. Pending final hearing, investigation was permitted to continue but no coercive action against petitioners, conditioned on their monthly reporting to the concerned police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case