SHUBHAM SIMALTI AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/843/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147,452,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010068802026

Filing Number

C528/3282/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

C528/843/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147,452,323,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHUBHAM SIMALTI AND ORS

    Adv. YASH BISHT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.RAJNISH CHANDRA JUYAL

    Adv. VIKAS BAHUGUNA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: C528/843/2026 Court Decision: The court allowed the compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No. 5460 of 2018 against Shubham Simalti and others. The FIR and chargesheet under IPC Sections 147, 452, 323, 504, and 506 were quashed after the parties reached an amicable settlement. Key Reasoning: Though the State objected that the offences were non-compoundable, the court followed Supreme Court precedent (B.S. Joshi case) permitting compounding of non-compoundable offences with court permission, and found that given the compromise, conviction was remote and continuing proceedings would cause injustice to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/843/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/843/2026 Court Decision: The court allowed the compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No. 5460 of 2018 against Shubham Simalti and others. The FIR and chargesheet under IPC Sections 147, 452, 323, 504, and 506 were quashed after the parties reached an amicable settlement. Key Reasoning: Though the State objected that the offences were non-compoundable, the court followed Supreme Court precedent (B.S. Joshi case) permitting compounding of non-compoundable offences with court permission, and found that given the compromise, conviction was remote and continuing proceedings would cause injustice to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case