RAJNISH CHANDRA JUYAL AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/844/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010068772026
Filing Number
C528/3281/2026
Filing Date
27-04-2026
Registration No
C528/844/2026
Registration Date
27-04-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJNISH CHANDRA JUYAL AND ORS
Adv. VIKAS BAHUGUNA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
SHUBHAM SIMALTI
Adv. YASH BISHT
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
Orders
Case Summary: C528/844/2026 The court allowed the compounding application filed by school principal Rajnish Juyal and others, who were charged under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506 for altercations arising from denying a student board exam appearance due to insufficient attendance. Justice Alok Mahra quashed the entire FIR and chargesheet after the complainant confirmed amicable settlement and withdrawal of criminal proceedings, relying on Supreme Court precedent that non-compoundable offences may be compounded when conviction possibility is remote. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C528/844/2026 The court allowed the compounding application filed by school principal Rajnish Juyal and others, who were charged under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506 for altercations arising from denying a student board exam appearance due to insufficient attendance. Justice Alok Mahra quashed the entire FIR and chargesheet after the complainant confirmed amicable settlement and withdrawal of criminal proceedings, relying on Supreme Court precedent that non-compoundable offences may be compounded when conviction possibility is remote. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts