RAJNISH CHANDRA JUYAL AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/844/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010068772026

Filing Number

C528/3281/2026

Filing Date

27-Apr-2026

Registration No

C528/844/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJNISH CHANDRA JUYAL AND ORS

    Adv. VIKAS BAHUGUNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SHUBHAM SIMALTI

    Adv. YASH BISHT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: C528/844/2026 The court allowed the compounding application filed by school principal Rajnish Juyal and others, who were charged under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506 for altercations arising from denying a student board exam appearance due to insufficient attendance. Justice Alok Mahra quashed the entire FIR and chargesheet after the complainant confirmed amicable settlement and withdrawal of criminal proceedings, relying on Supreme Court precedent that non-compoundable offences may be compounded when conviction possibility is remote. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/844/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/844/2026 The court allowed the compounding application filed by school principal Rajnish Juyal and others, who were charged under IPC Sections 323, 504, and 506 for altercations arising from denying a student board exam appearance due to insufficient attendance. Justice Alok Mahra quashed the entire FIR and chargesheet after the complainant confirmed amicable settlement and withdrawal of criminal proceedings, relying on Supreme Court precedent that non-compoundable offences may be compounded when conviction possibility is remote. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case