DISTRICT MAGISTRATE NAINITAL vs GHANSHYAM SINGH BISHT Advocate - SANJAY BHATT — SPA/132/2026

Case under Under Rule 5, Chapter Viii of the High Court Rule Section VIII. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010068212026

Filing Number

SPA/3566/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

SPA/132/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Rule 5, Chapter Viii of the High Court Rule Section VIII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE NAINITAL

    Adv. C.S.C.

  2. 2.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

  3. 3.TEHSILDAR TEHSIL DHARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GHANSHYAM SINGH BISHT Advocate - SANJAY BHATT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-May-2026

    Pronouncement Of Judgment -2

  3. 23-May-2026

    Revoked

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  4. 22-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary: SPA/132/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the respondent's right to compassionate appointment under the Dying in Harness Rules. The court found that the respondent's father, though initially appointed as a seasonal Collection Amin in 1994, had rendered continuous service for over three years in a regular vacancy and was thus covered under Rule 2(a)(iii) of the Rules as a "Government Servant." Since his regularization was later confirmed by court orders (2009-2010), the State cannot retroactively deny his status to reject his son's compassionate appointment claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 14-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

  6. 14-May-2026

    Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  7. 13-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SPA/132/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SPA/132/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the respondent's right to compassionate appointment under the Dying in Harness Rules. The court found that the respondent's father, though initially appointed as a seasonal Collection Amin in 1994, had rendered continuous service for over three years in a regular vacancy and was thus covered under Rule 2(a)(iii) of the Rules as a "Government Servant." Since his regularization was later confirmed by court orders (2009-2010), the State cannot retroactively deny his status to reject his son's compassionate appointment claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case