RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. vs SMT. RAJNI NAUTIYAL Advocate - NIRANJAN BHATT — AO/187/2019
Case under An Appeal U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section OTHER. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 19th March 2021.
CNR: UKHC010067282019
Filing Number
AO/3699/2019
Filing Date
08-May-2019
Registration No
AO/187/2019
Registration Date
08-May-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
UNDER SECTION173 MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
19-Mar-2021
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
Adv. SARVESH AGARWAL,BHARAT TEWARI,BHARAT TEWARI, ,PULAK AGARWAL,BHARAT TEWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. RAJNI NAUTIYAL Advocate - NIRANJAN BHATT
-
2.MASTER AKSHAT MINOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF
The court allowed the respondents' Money Withdrawal Application seeking release of the statutory deposit of ₹25,000. Since Reliance General Insurance Company had already withdrawn the appeal on 19.03.2021 and raised no objection to the withdrawal application, the court directed release of the deposited amount in favor of the respondents/claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra MaithaniView PDF
-
09-May-2019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar SharmaView PDF
-
09-May-2019
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma
-
08-May-2019
Case filed
Registration No. AO/187/2019
The court allowed the respondents' Money Withdrawal Application seeking release of the statutory deposit of ₹25,000. Since Reliance General Insurance Company had already withdrawn the appeal on 19.03.2021 and raised no objection to the withdrawal application, the court directed release of the deposited amount in favor of the respondents/claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts