SHARAT CHANDRA SINDHWANI vs SUMAN SHARMA — C528/819/2026

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Act No. 43 of 2005) Section 17,18,19,20,21,22. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010066902026

Filing Number

C528/3173/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

C528/819/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Act No. 43 of 2005) Section 17,18,19,20,21,22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHARAT CHANDRA SINDHWANI

    Adv. R P SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUMAN SHARMA

  2. 2.SATE OF UTTARAKHAND

    Adv. G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    The court directed expedited disposal of a domestic violence case pending since 2017 under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. Noting over 80 adjournments sought by respondent, Justice Alok Mahra ordered the trial court to conclude proceedings within six months without granting unnecessary adjournments, finding expeditious resolution serves justice interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/819/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court directed expedited disposal of a domestic violence case pending since 2017 under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. Noting over 80 adjournments sought by respondent, Justice Alok Mahra ordered the trial court to conclude proceedings within six months without granting unnecessary adjournments, finding expeditious resolution serves justice interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case