SHARAT CHANDRA SINDHWANI vs SUMAN SHARMA — C528/819/2026

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Act No. 43 of 2005) Section 17,18,19,20,21,22. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010066902026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

C528/3173/2026

Filing Date

23-04-2026

Registration No

C528/819/2026

Registration Date

23-04-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF OTHER COMPLAINT CASE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Act No. 43 of 2005) Section 17,18,19,20,21,22

Petitioner(s)

SHARAT CHANDRA SINDHWANI

Adv. R P SINGH

Respondent(s)

SUMAN SHARMA

SATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Adv. G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

27-04-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

Orders

07-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

The court directed expedited disposal of a domestic violence case pending since 2017 under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. Noting over 80 adjournments sought by respondent, Justice Alok Mahra ordered the trial court to conclude proceedings within six months without granting unnecessary adjournments, finding expeditious resolution serves justice interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court directed expedited disposal of a domestic violence case pending since 2017 under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. Noting over 80 adjournments sought by respondent, Justice Alok Mahra ordered the trial court to conclude proceedings within six months without granting unnecessary adjournments, finding expeditious resolution serves justice interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case