MISKEEN JAHAN vs AKHTAR — WPMS/1096/2026
Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010065562026
Filing Number
WPMS/3435/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPMS/1096/2026
Registration Date
22-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MISKEEN JAHAN
Adv. SHWETA JAIN,DIVYA JAIN,DIVYA JAIN, ,DIVYA JAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.AKHTAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
WPMS/1096/2026 – Miskeen Jahan v. Akhtar The court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable, holding that the petitioner had alternative remedies under CPC Section 7 Rule 11. However, recognizing the petitioner's acute financial hardship while caring for two minor children without spousal support from her husband in Dubai, the court directed the High Court Legal Service Authority to immediately provide free legal aid counsel to contest the underlying civil suit for permanent injunction filed by her father-in-law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
15-May-2026
Fresh Cases As Defective -236
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
28-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
-
28-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases As Defective -236
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
-
23-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/1096/2026
WPMS/1096/2026 – Miskeen Jahan v. Akhtar The court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable, holding that the petitioner had alternative remedies under CPC Section 7 Rule 11. However, recognizing the petitioner's acute financial hardship while caring for two minor children without spousal support from her husband in Dubai, the court directed the High Court Legal Service Authority to immediately provide free legal aid counsel to contest the underlying civil suit for permanent injunction filed by her father-in-law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts