GAYATRI IRON AND STEEL vs THE COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAX Advocate - C.S.C. — CTR/6/2026
Case under Under Section 55 of Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act 2005 Section 55. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010064112026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CTR/3353/2026
Filing Date
21-04-2026
Registration No
CTR/6/2026
Registration Date
21-04-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
REVISIONS ( 4 )
Sub-Category
COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GAYATRI IRON AND STEEL
Adv. PULAK RAJ MULLICK,SAHIL MULLICK,SAHIL MULLICK, ,SAHIL MULLICK
Respondent(s)
THE COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAX Advocate - C.S.C.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand admitted Gayatri Iron and Steel's revision petition (CTR No.6/2026) against the Commissioner of Commercial Tax on 04.05.2026. The court accepted the substantial question of law regarding whether the Tribunal erred in holding that the petitioner failed to discharge its burden under Section 66 of the VAT Act, 2005, and whether presentation of original C Forms shifts the onus to revenue to prove forgery. The case was listed for further hearing along with related matters CTR No.2 of 2024 and CTR No.3/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand admitted Gayatri Iron and Steel's revision petition (CTR No.6/2026) against the Commissioner of Commercial Tax on 04.05.2026. The court accepted the substantial question of law regarding whether the Tribunal erred in holding that the petitioner failed to discharge its burden under Section 66 of the VAT Act, 2005, and whether presentation of original C Forms shifts the onus to revenue to prove forgery. The case was listed for further hearing along with related matters CTR No.2 of 2024 and CTR No.3/2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts