NOSHAD ALIAS SULLA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/637/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/21. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010063832026

Filing Number

BA1/3042/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

BA1/637/2026

Registration Date

20-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NOSHAD ALIAS SULLA

    Adv. RAJNI RANGWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    Case Summary: BA1/637/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Noshad (alias Sulla) in a narcotic drugs case. The applicant was arrested under Sections 8/21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act with 6.60 grams of heroin recovered—below commercial quantity. The court found merit in arguments regarding alleged police misconduct, FIR lodging delays, and the small quantity involved, warranting bail release on personal bond and two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA1/637/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA1/637/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Noshad (alias Sulla) in a narcotic drugs case. The applicant was arrested under Sections 8/21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act with 6.60 grams of heroin recovered—below commercial quantity. The court found merit in arguments regarding alleged police misconduct, FIR lodging delays, and the small quantity involved, warranting bail release on personal bond and two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case