ISHWAR CHANDRA GUPTA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT — WPMS/2084/2018
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010063682018
Filing Number
WPMS/1011264/2018
Filing Date
20-Jul-2018
Registration No
WPMS/2084/2018
Registration Date
20-Jul-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
UTTARAKHAND OTHER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES ACT ( 55 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ISHWAR CHANDRA GUPTA
Adv. DR. KARTIKEY HARI GUPTA, ,PALLAVI BAHUGUNA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Adv. ,C.S.C.,NARESH PANT,DEPUTY S.G. 1123
-
2.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Adv. NARESH PANT
-
3.M/S DEEPAK BUILDERS BEHIND GUDIA COMPLEX BAZPUR ROAD
-
4.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY
Adv. DEPUTY S.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
Case Summary: WPMS/2084/2018 Ishwar Chandra Gupta's petition seeking mandamus to redesign a National Highway 74 approach road from 230 meters back to the original 165 meters was dismissed. The court held that since the highway work was already completed and road design is a matter requiring technical expertise, judicial intervention would be improper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2019
Admission Matters -25
-
16-Nov-2018
Orders On Applications -24
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia
-
02-Nov-2018
Orders On Applications -22
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia
-
02-Aug-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jul-2018
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/2084/2018
Case Summary: WPMS/2084/2018 Ishwar Chandra Gupta's petition seeking mandamus to redesign a National Highway 74 approach road from 230 meters back to the original 165 meters was dismissed. The court held that since the highway work was already completed and road design is a matter requiring technical expertise, judicial intervention would be improper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts