NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD vs AMIT KUMAR — WPMS/1020/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: UKHC010062492026

Filing Number

WPMS/3273/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPMS/1020/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF LABOUR COURT ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD

    Adv. AWANISH UPADHYAYA

  2. 2.NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD SHIVALIK NAGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMIT KUMAR

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  4. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    Case Summary: WPMS 1020/2026 On 06.05.2026, the court found that a recovery certificate issued by the Additional Labour Commissioner, Haridwar was without jurisdiction because Section 6(H) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not authorize such recovery mode—only Section 5(5) permits Labour Court awards to be executed as civil court decrees. The court stayed the recovery order dated 09.04.2026 and granted the respondent three weeks to file a counter affidavit. The case is listed for 10.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/1020/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPMS 1020/2026 On 06.05.2026, the court found that a recovery certificate issued by the Additional Labour Commissioner, Haridwar was without jurisdiction because Section 6(H) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not authorize such recovery mode—only Section 5(5) permits Labour Court awards to be executed as civil court decrees. The court stayed the recovery order dated 09.04.2026 and granted the respondent three weeks to file a counter affidavit. The case is listed for 10.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case