MANJOOR ALI vs PROFESSOR DR MANMOHAN SINGH CHAUHAN — CLCON/182/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010061542026

Filing Number

CLCON/3222/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

CLCON/182/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJOOR ALI

    Adv. HARENDRA BELWAL,SAGAR KUMAR,SAGAR KUMAR, ,SAGAR KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PROFESSOR DR MANMOHAN SINGH CHAUHAN

  2. 2.SHRI B S CHALAL

  3. 3.DR. G C JOSHI

  4. 4.DR SURENDRA NARAYAN PANDEY

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    Case Summary: CLCON/182/2026 The Court found that respondents (Professor Dr. Manmohan Singh Chauhan, Shri B S Chalal, and Dr. G C Joshi) failed to comply with a Writ Court judgment dated 06.01.2025, despite being granted an extended four-month compliance period that had expired. Notices were issued to the respondents requiring them to file a response explaining why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The case was adjourned to 29.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLCON/182/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CLCON/182/2026 The Court found that respondents (Professor Dr. Manmohan Singh Chauhan, Shri B S Chalal, and Dr. G C Joshi) failed to comply with a Writ Court judgment dated 06.01.2025, despite being granted an extended four-month compliance period that had expired. Notices were issued to the respondents requiring them to file a response explaining why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The case was adjourned to 29.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case