BABLI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLR/275/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010061082026
Filing Number
CRLR/2900/2026
Filing Date
16-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRLR/275/2026
Registration Date
16-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISIONS ( 4 )
Sub-Category
U/S 401 CODE OF CR.P.C.{CASES IN WHICH NOTICE TO ENHANCE SENTENCE/CONVICTION ISSUED(DB)} ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BABLI
Adv. ZAFAR SIDDIQUE,DAUD ALI,DAUD ALI, ,DAUD ALI
-
2.BABY MISHTHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.RAVI KUMAR
Adv. BHUPENDRA SINGH KORANGA,AJEET KUMAR YADAV
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
19-May-2026
Personal Appearance -4
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
Case Summary: CRLR 275/2026 In this criminal revision petition filed by Babli and Baby Mishthi against the State of Uttarakhand and Ravi Kumar, the court found that no advocate appeared for the petitioners and proper service of the respondent had not been completed. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal granted the petitioners three days to effect service on the respondent and adjourned the case to 19.05.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
18-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
-
18-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLR/275/2026
Case Summary: CRLR 275/2026 In this criminal revision petition filed by Babli and Baby Mishthi against the State of Uttarakhand and Ravi Kumar, the court found that no advocate appeared for the petitioners and proper service of the respondent had not been completed. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal granted the petitioners three days to effect service on the respondent and adjourned the case to 19.05.2026 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts