MS SHAMA ARTS vs ZILA PANCHAYAT DEHRADUN Advocate - N S PUNDIR — WPMS/961/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010059662026

Filing Number

WPMS/3134/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPMS/961/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MS SHAMA ARTS

    Adv. GULSHAN PANDEY,PARITOSH DALAKOTI,PARITOSH DALAKOTI, ,PARITOSH DALAKOTI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ZILA PANCHAYAT DEHRADUN Advocate - N S PUNDIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed MS Shama Arts' writ petition challenging Zila Panchayat Dehradun's e-tender for collecting advertising fees through a contractor. The court found the petition was based on mere apprehension of future overcharging and harassment, without concrete evidence of injury. The court directed that if such issues arise, petitioners may lodge complaints with the Chief Executive Officer of Zila Panchayat, whose decision shall follow due process and law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/961/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed MS Shama Arts' writ petition challenging Zila Panchayat Dehradun's e-tender for collecting advertising fees through a contractor. The court found the petition was based on mere apprehension of future overcharging and harassment, without concrete evidence of injury. The court directed that if such issues arise, petitioners may lodge complaints with the Chief Executive Officer of Zila Panchayat, whose decision shall follow due process and law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case