JAGROOP SINGH AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/707/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 504,506,354,307. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010059632026

Filing Number

C528/2829/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

C528/707/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 504,506,354,307
Arms Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) Section 30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGROOP SINGH AND ORS

    Adv. S R S GILL,MILIND RAJ,MILIND RAJ, ,MILIND RAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.ANOOP SINGH

    Adv. KUNDAN SINGH

  3. 3.JOGA SINGH

    Adv. KUNDAN SINGH

  4. 4.MANPREET KAUR ALIAS MUNNAT

    Adv. KUNDAN SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    Case Summary: C528/707/2026 The court allowed Jagroop Singh and others' compounding application and quashed all criminal proceedings (Sessions Trial No.207 of 2023) against them, finding that the parties had amicably settled their dispute. The applicants were accused of firing a gunshot at Joga Singh, causing injury near his forehead, but the defense contended no firearm was discharged and only simple injuries resulted from a scuffle, supported by medical evidence. Following Supreme Court precedent permitting quashing of proceedings where compromise renders conviction remote, the court held that continuing prosecution would cause prejudice to the accused and allowed the offences to be compounded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/707/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C528/707/2026 The court allowed Jagroop Singh and others' compounding application and quashed all criminal proceedings (Sessions Trial No.207 of 2023) against them, finding that the parties had amicably settled their dispute. The applicants were accused of firing a gunshot at Joga Singh, causing injury near his forehead, but the defense contended no firearm was discharged and only simple injuries resulted from a scuffle, supported by medical evidence. Following Supreme Court precedent permitting quashing of proceedings where compromise renders conviction remote, the court held that continuing prosecution would cause prejudice to the accused and allowed the offences to be compounded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case