OMKAR ADVERTISING AGENCY vs ZILA PANCHAYAT DEHRADUN Advocate - N S PUNDIR — WPMS/960/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010059602026
Filing Number
WPMS/3131/2026
Filing Date
15-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPMS/960/2026
Registration Date
15-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.OMKAR ADVERTISING AGENCY
Adv. PARITOSH DALAKOTI,GULSHAN PANDEY,GULSHAN PANDEY, ,GULSHAN PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.ZILA PANCHAYAT DEHRADUN Advocate - N S PUNDIR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
Case Summary: WPMS/960/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the writ petition filed by Omkar Advertising Agency (and two related petitions) against Zila Panchayat Dehradun, finding the petitions were based on mere apprehension and presumption rather than concrete grievances. The court held that advertising agencies cannot challenge an e-tender for contractor selection based on future fears of overcharging, and directed petitioners to file complaints with the Chief Executive Officer of Zila Panchayat if actual wrongdoing occurs in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/960/2026
Case Summary: WPMS/960/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the writ petition filed by Omkar Advertising Agency (and two related petitions) against Zila Panchayat Dehradun, finding the petitions were based on mere apprehension and presumption rather than concrete grievances. The court held that advertising agencies cannot challenge an e-tender for contractor selection based on future fears of overcharging, and directed petitioners to file complaints with the Chief Executive Officer of Zila Panchayat if actual wrongdoing occurs in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts