SACHIN KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/702/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,504,506,498-A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010059482026
Filing Number
C528/2822/2026
Filing Date
15-Apr-2026
Registration No
C528/702/2026
Registration Date
15-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SACHIN KUMAR
Adv. KARAN ANAND
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SMT. PRIYANKA THAPLIYAL
Adv. SUBHASH JOSHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
The High Court allowed Sachin Kumar's petition and compounding application, quashing the entire Criminal Case No. 4012 of 2025 pending in Dehradun. The court found that the parties had amicably settled their disputes and were living together happily, making conviction remote; therefore, continuing proceedings would cause prejudice to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
-
15-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. C528/702/2026
The High Court allowed Sachin Kumar's petition and compounding application, quashing the entire Criminal Case No. 4012 of 2025 pending in Dehradun. The court found that the parties had amicably settled their disputes and were living together happily, making conviction remote; therefore, continuing proceedings would cause prejudice to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts