MICKEY AFZAL vs MS MDDA RAMKEY ISBT LTD — WPMB/296/2026
Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 29th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010059252026
Filing Number
WPMS/3112/2026
Filing Date
15-04-2026
Registration No
WPMB/296/2026
Registration Date
15-04-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATED TO COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION ( 20 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MICKEY AFZAL
Adv. ADITYA SINGH
Respondent(s)
MS MDDA RAMKEY ISBT LTD
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 29-04-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 27-04-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 20-04-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: WPMB/296/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of Mickey Afzal's writ petition challenging the Additional District Judge's execution orders that rejected his objections under Section 47 CPC and directed property sale proceedings. The court found the impugned orders already contemplated serving notice before sale advertisement per Order XXI Rule 66 CPC. The petition was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty for petitioners to file further objections before the Executing Court, which will decide them in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WPMB/296/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of Mickey Afzal's writ petition challenging the Additional District Judge's execution orders that rejected his objections under Section 47 CPC and directed property sale proceedings. The court found the impugned orders already contemplated serving notice before sale advertisement per Order XXI Rule 66 CPC. The petition was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty for petitioners to file further objections before the Executing Court, which will decide them in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts