BAJAJ AUTO LIMITED vs SANJAY SINGH RAYAL Advocate - YOGESH KUMAR PACHOLIA — SPA/102/2026

Case under Under Rule 5, Chapter Viii of the High Court Rule Section VIII. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010058512026

Filing Number

SPA/3083/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

SPA/102/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Rule 5, Chapter Viii of the High Court Rule Section VIII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ AUTO LIMITED

    Adv. PIYUSH GARG

  2. 2.VICE PRESIDENT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY SINGH RAYAL Advocate - YOGESH KUMAR PACHOLIA

  2. 2.SANDEEP KUMAR

    Adv. YOGESH KUMAR PACHOLIA

  3. 3.MAHENDRA SINGH PANCHAPAL

    Adv. YOGESH KUMAR PACHOLIA

  4. 4.YASH VEER SINGH ARANA

    Adv. YOGESH KUMAR PACHOLIA

  5. 5.SAGAR RAWAT

    Adv. YOGESH KUMAR PACHOLIA

  6. 6.CHANDRA PRAKASH

    Adv. YOGESH KUMAR PACHOLIA

  7. 7.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

    Adv. C.S.C.

  8. 8.LABOUR COMMISSIONER

    Adv. C.S.C.

  9. 9.ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary: SPA/102/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand set aside the Single Judge's order staying Bajaj Auto Limited's transfer of six employees from its Pantnagar plant to Aurangabad, Maharashtra. The Division Bench held the writ petition challenging the transfer order unmaintainable against the private company, as transfer was a contractual condition of employment and not a matter for writ jurisdiction. The court directed the Conciliation Officer to expeditiously conclude pending labour conciliation proceedings by May 5, 2026, or within a week thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SPA/102/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SPA/102/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand set aside the Single Judge's order staying Bajaj Auto Limited's transfer of six employees from its Pantnagar plant to Aurangabad, Maharashtra. The Division Bench held the writ petition challenging the transfer order unmaintainable against the private company, as transfer was a contractual condition of employment and not a matter for writ jurisdiction. The court directed the Conciliation Officer to expeditiously conclude pending labour conciliation proceedings by May 5, 2026, or within a week thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case