COMMISSIONER STATE COMMERCIAL TAX UTTARAKHAND vs M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. Advocate - JITENDRA CHAUDHARY, ABHAY GARG,B R GARG — CTR/45/2023
Case under Under Section 55 of Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act 2005 Section 55. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010058202023
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CTR/2545/2023
Filing Date
17-04-2023
Registration No
CTR/45/2023
Registration Date
17-04-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
REVISIONS ( 4 )
Sub-Category
COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
COMMISSIONER STATE COMMERCIAL TAX UTTARAKHAND
Adv. C.S.C.
Respondent(s)
M/S INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. Advocate - JITENDRA CHAUDHARY, ABHAY GARG,B R GARG
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2023 | Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247 |
| 08-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 24-12-2024 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 02-12-2024 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 27-08-2024 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
Orders
Summary of CTR/45/2023: On 08.05.2026, the court (Judges Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J. and Subhash Upadhyay, J.) adjourned the case for listing after six weeks. The Urgency Application (IA No. 01 of 2026) filed by the Commissioner of State Commercial Tax, Uttarakhand (petitioner) was disposed of. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CTR/45/2023: On 08.05.2026, the court (Judges Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J. and Subhash Upadhyay, J.) adjourned the case for listing after six weeks. The Urgency Application (IA No. 01 of 2026) filed by the Commissioner of State Commercial Tax, Uttarakhand (petitioner) was disposed of. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts