GANGA DEVI vs PRABHAT SHAH DECEASED — AO/127/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 43 (1) (R). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010058022026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

AO/3059/2026

Filing Date

10-04-2026

Registration No

AO/127/2026

Registration Date

10-04-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

UNDER ORDER 43 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908 ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 43 (1) (R)

Petitioner(s)

GANGA DEVI

Adv. SANPREET SINGH AJMANI,BHAVYA PRATAP SINGH RAUTELA,BHAVYA PRATAP SINGH RAUTELA, ,BHUPENDRA SINGH,BHAVYA PRATAP SINGH RAUTELA

SUNDER LAL VERMA

PUSHKAR VERMA

PUSHPA DEVI

DINESH VERMA

GANESH LAL VERMA

BHUWAN VERMA

SMT TARA DEVI

RAVI VERMA

RATAN VERMA

CHANDAN LAL VERMA

SMT LACHIMA DEVI

BACCHI LAL VERMA

GIRISH LAL VERMA

PRAKASH LAL

JEEWAN LAL

POORAN LAL

Respondent(s)

PRABHAT SHAH DECEASED

ASHOK PAL

RAMESH PAL (SINCE DECEASED )

MAHESH PAL (SINCE DECEASED)(Legal Heir)4.

LATE SHRI BRIJLAL4.

MANISH PAL4.

ISHANT PAL4.

ASHISH PAL

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Adv. C.S.C.

THE JOINT SECRETARY

Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

15-04-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

Orders

07-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Case Summary: AO/127/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the appellants' appeal against the lower court's rejection of their temporary injunction application. The court found no prima facie case, as appellants claimed rights via a 1945 exchange deed to their predecessor but never mutated his name, remained absent from the property for 77 years, and failed to establish irreparable harm. The respondent held a valid sale deed and freehold grant with ongoing construction, making the balance of convenience favor the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AO/127/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the appellants' appeal against the lower court's rejection of their temporary injunction application. The court found no prima facie case, as appellants claimed rights via a 1945 exchange deed to their predecessor but never mutated his name, remained absent from the property for 77 years, and failed to establish irreparable harm. The respondent held a valid sale deed and freehold grant with ongoing construction, making the balance of convenience favor the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case