GANGA DEVI vs PRABHAT SHAH DECEASED — AO/127/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 43 (1) (R). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010058022026

Filing Number

AO/3059/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

AO/127/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

UNDER ORDER 43 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908 ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 43 (1) (R)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GANGA DEVI

    Adv. SANPREET SINGH AJMANI,BHAVYA PRATAP SINGH RAUTELA,BHAVYA PRATAP SINGH RAUTELA, ,BHUPENDRA SINGH,BHAVYA PRATAP SINGH RAUTELA

  2. 2.SUNDER LAL VERMA

  3. 3.PUSHKAR VERMA

  4. 4.PUSHPA DEVI

  5. 5.DINESH VERMA

  6. 6.GANESH LAL VERMA

  7. 7.BHUWAN VERMA

  8. 8.SMT TARA DEVI

  9. 9.RAVI VERMA

  10. 10.RATAN VERMA

  11. 11.CHANDAN LAL VERMA

  12. 12.SMT LACHIMA DEVI

  13. 13.BACCHI LAL VERMA

  14. 14.GIRISH LAL VERMA

  15. 15.PRAKASH LAL

  16. 16.JEEWAN LAL

  17. 17.POORAN LAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRABHAT SHAH DECEASED

  2. 2.ASHOK PAL

  3. 3.RAMESH PAL (SINCE DECEASED )

  4. 4.MAHESH PAL (SINCE DECEASED)(Legal Heir)4.

  5. 5.LATE SHRI BRIJLAL4.

  6. 6.MANISH PAL4.

  7. 7.ISHANT PAL4.

  8. 8.ASHISH PAL

  9. 9.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

    Adv. C.S.C.

  10. 10.THE JOINT SECRETARY

    Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra MaithaniView PDF

    Case Summary: AO/127/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the appellants' appeal against the lower court's rejection of their temporary injunction application. The court found no prima facie case, as appellants claimed rights via a 1945 exchange deed to their predecessor but never mutated his name, remained absent from the property for 77 years, and failed to establish irreparable harm. The respondent held a valid sale deed and freehold grant with ongoing construction, making the balance of convenience favor the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO/127/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AO/127/2026 The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the appellants' appeal against the lower court's rejection of their temporary injunction application. The court found no prima facie case, as appellants claimed rights via a 1945 exchange deed to their predecessor but never mutated his name, remained absent from the property for 77 years, and failed to establish irreparable harm. The respondent held a valid sale deed and freehold grant with ongoing construction, making the balance of convenience favor the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case