JASPAL SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMB/257/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010057432026
Filing Number
WPMB/3026/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPMB/257/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MINES & MINERALS ACT ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JASPAL SINGH
Adv. HARSHPAL SEKHON,BALVINDER SINGH,BALVINDER SINGH, ,BALVINDER SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.
-
2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.DIRECTORATE OF GEOLOGY AND MINING
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.TEHSILDAR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
6.GURPREET SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of the writ petition challenging an illegal mining penalty imposed on Jaspal Singh, directing the Division Commissioner to decide the petitioner's Stay Extension Application within two weeks. Until the Commissioner's decision, recovery proceedings are stayed, but if the application is rejected, the petitioner loses interim protection and may pursue further legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMB/257/2026
The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of the writ petition challenging an illegal mining penalty imposed on Jaspal Singh, directing the Division Commissioner to decide the petitioner's Stay Extension Application within two weeks. Until the Commissioner's decision, recovery proceedings are stayed, but if the application is rejected, the petitioner loses interim protection and may pursue further legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts