VIPIN KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLR/258/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 420,120B. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010057402026
Filing Number
CRLR/2714/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRLR/258/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISIONS ( 4 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIPIN KUMAR
Adv. VINAY BHATT,MOHD SHAFY,MOHD SHAFY, ,MOHD SHAFY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.S.H.O
Adv. G.A.
-
3.SMT. DEVKI DEVI
Adv. ABHISHEK DUTT
-
4.HAYAT RAM
Adv. ABHISHEK DUTT
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
The court admitted four criminal revision petitions (CRLR Nos. 246, 250, 256, and 258 of 2026) filed by convicts challenging their seven-year sentences confirmed by the appellate court. Exemption applications seeking exemption from surrender were allowed for all revisionists after the court noted that parties had entered into compromise. The bail applications in two revisions were dismissed as not pressed, and the case was listed for hearing in the week commencing 06.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Orders On Applications -22
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
02-May-2026
Orders On Applications -22
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
29-Apr-2026
Orders On Applications -22
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
23-Apr-2026
Orders On Applications -22
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
20-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLR/258/2026
The court admitted four criminal revision petitions (CRLR Nos. 246, 250, 256, and 258 of 2026) filed by convicts challenging their seven-year sentences confirmed by the appellate court. Exemption applications seeking exemption from surrender were allowed for all revisionists after the court noted that parties had entered into compromise. The bail applications in two revisions were dismissed as not pressed, and the case was listed for hearing in the week commencing 06.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts