VIPIN KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLR/258/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 420,120B. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010057402026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CRLR/2714/2026
Filing Date
09-04-2026
Registration No
CRLR/258/2026
Registration Date
09-04-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISIONS ( 4 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIPIN KUMAR
Adv. VINAY BHATT,MOHD SHAFY,MOHD SHAFY, ,MOHD SHAFY
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
S.H.O
Adv. G.A.
SMT. DEVKI DEVI
Adv. ABHISHEK DUTT
HAYAT RAM
Adv. ABHISHEK DUTT
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 04-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 02-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 29-04-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 23-04-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
Orders
The court admitted four criminal revision petitions (CRLR Nos. 246, 250, 256, and 258 of 2026) filed by convicts challenging their seven-year sentences confirmed by the appellate court. Exemption applications seeking exemption from surrender were allowed for all revisionists after the court noted that parties had entered into compromise. The bail applications in two revisions were dismissed as not pressed, and the case was listed for hearing in the week commencing 06.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court admitted four criminal revision petitions (CRLR Nos. 246, 250, 256, and 258 of 2026) filed by convicts challenging their seven-year sentences confirmed by the appellate court. Exemption applications seeking exemption from surrender were allowed for all revisionists after the court noted that parties had entered into compromise. The bail applications in two revisions were dismissed as not pressed, and the case was listed for hearing in the week commencing 06.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts